Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Tax Analysis & Pigouvian Gap

PolicyEngine

Current Tax Structure

Beer Taxes in NYC (per 12 oz)

Excise Taxes:

Sales Tax:

Total tax: $1.09/beer (8.7% of consumer price)

Revenue Flow

Consumer pays:              $12.50
├─ Sales tax (→ government): $1.02
├─ Excise tax (→ government): $0.074
└─ Net to stadium:           $11.41
   ├─ Production cost:       -$5.00
   ├─ Internalized costs:    -$0.04
   └─ Profit:                 $6.37/beer

Annual Tax Revenue (Current)

Per game (40,000 beers):

Per season (81 games):

External Costs Not Covered by Current Taxes

Crime Externalities: $2.50/beer

Based on Carpenter & Dobkin (2015):

Health Externalities: $1.50/beer

Based on Manning et al. (1991) (inflation-adjusted):

Total External Cost: $4.00/beer

Pigouvian Tax Gap

External cost per beer:      $4.00
Current tax per beer:        $1.09
────────────────────────────────
Pigouvian gap:               $2.91

Coverage ratio:              27.3%
Undertaxed amount:           72.7%

Comparison to Other Goods

GoodExternal CostCurrent TaxCoverage
Stadium beer$4.00$1.0927%
Cigarettes$10/pack$5-8/pack50-80%
Gasoline$2/gallon$0.50/gal25%
Carbon$100/ton$0-30/ton0-30%

Stadium beer is significantly undertaxed relative to externalities.

Optimal Pigouvian Tax

Recommendation: +$2.91/beer

This would:

  1. Internalize external costs (consumers face full social cost)

  2. Reduce consumption to socially optimal level

  3. Raise revenue for affected communities

  4. Improve efficiency (no deadweight loss)

Revenue Projections

Per game:

Per season:

(Lower than naïve $9.4M due to demand reduction)

Where Should Revenue Go?

Affected parties:

  1. Bronx community: Bears crime externalities

  2. NYC public health: Emergency services, hospitals

  3. NYPD: Policing costs on game days

  4. MTA: Drunk passenger incidents

Allocation recommendation:

Tax Incidence

Who actually bears the tax burden?

With beer demand elasticity ε = -0.29 (semi-log at $12.50):

Pass-through rate:

θ=11ϵ=11.29=0.78\theta = \frac{1}{1 - \epsilon} = \frac{1}{1.29} = 0.78

Effect of $2.91 tax:

Result:

Burden split: 78% consumers, 22% stadium

This is standard tax incidence: more inelastic side bears more burden.

Alternative Revenue Uses

Option 1: Reduce Other Taxes

Use $11.0M to reduce property taxes in the Bronx

Option 2: Public Safety

Increase police presence, security on game days

Option 3: Public Health

Alcohol treatment programs, ER capacity

Option 4: Return to Fans

Subsidize ticket prices or public transportation

Most efficient: Target spending toward externality reduction (safety, health).

References
  1. Carpenter, C., & Dobkin, C. (2015). The Minimum Legal Drinking Age and Crime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(2), 521–524. 10.1162/REST_a_00489
  2. Manning, W. G., Keeler, E. B., Newhouse, J. P., Sloss, E. M., & Wasserman, J. (1991). The Costs of Poor Health Habits. Harvard University Press.